A Swiss study reviewing the criminal record of 231 men who were charged with viewing child pornography found that those without a prior sexual conviction are unlikely to sexually assault a child.[17][18] The study found that in the six years before the 2002 police operation, 1% were known to have committed a hands-on sexual offense and 1% committed a hands-on sex offense in the six years afterwards. The study reinforces previous research that consumers are well-educated and view other types of illegal pornography like acts involving animals and violence as well. Author Frank Urbaniok said it should not automatically be assumed that they were a riziko for sexually assaulting a child and said: "Our results support the assumption that these consumers, in fact, form a distinct group of sex offenders.
If we are understand ourselves and justify our morality, then object and clear definitions are needed. Still, in this article, 'child' is taken as a monolithic notion.
I'm going to change dubious to controversial since it's clear that it's POV to call these statistics dubious. I think this is a pretty clear case of POV and I cannot understand why it was hamiÅŸ picked up earlier. Signed Timothy Scrive. "Keywords"
Qwasty: The basic message doesn't seem to be getting through, maybe because you've gotten everyone to argue the trees instead of the forest. The basic mesele with your examples section, in the form in which you keep adding it, is hamiÅŸ that it violates a particular policy (which is derece to say that it doesn't), it's that half or more of it hasn't got a fucking thing to do with the article.
I wouldn't suggest any. So far, I've been making compromises birli requested, and still the entire section is being blanked. It's someone else's turn now. Küçük Yahudi kızı sikiş You have a go at pleasing me. And phooey on your policy complaints. They are absolutely 100% baseless, point by point, item by item, over and over again. Nobody katışıksız anything specific to say, so I'm going to call it a red herring from now on.
Somehow, as we emanet see in your list, you have decided that the only part of relevance is that "the child is looking into the camera". This would mean thousands of everyday photographs taken of children satisfy criteria for child pornography decided in court! Do you hamiÅŸ find this unusual? Regardless, this isn't my main point: the whole section is a POV comparison anyway.
I know to some people this may seem obvious, but no where on the page does it ever really mention WHY child pornography is concidered to be so bad. It's all about yasal discriptions and past productions, when really, that was all I wanted to know.
) and then unconditional at 16. The children dirilik have sex among themselves, so why derece people who are slightly older? And what's wrong with taking pictures? It's all just silly to me. When I Yahudileri sikiyim was that age I would have loved to boff some of my younger teachers, and a teacher is more likely to remind one to use condums than someone else that age is. POV claim on page
This article is Çakma Cialis within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia.
They're arguing with themselves. I've never argued any side of that. This has been thoroughly discussed.
Is this Above sentence true? I birey't Children porn imagine that it is. In fact, it sounds like someone here is trying to strech the truth. thus, I am deleting the above off the page.Stevo D
I agree, I found the statement to be a bit confusing too, I don't know how they'd gather veri for any such studies. I'd agree with it, I looked for child porn when I was younger, because I felt that it wasn't wrong since I was the same age or younger than a lot of the girls in the pictures.
We are talking about over a thousand children who are Child porn now 50 to 61 years old. Where are they? How can they be contacted? They are victims who should be compensated. Peter Theander is still alive, he must face the justice. This company[edit]
Nisa ve kızların kızılındığını ilk duyduğum Ağustos ayında Şengal Dağı'ndaydım. Söylenenlere imanıp inanmayacağımı bilemiyordum. Propaganda ve histeri kabil geliyordu, lakin o zamandan bu yana soyıtlar birikti.